| 6.1 | Keep this objective. Add to special population targets youth ages 10-14 years. |
| 6.2 | Keep this objective but add another objective that measures the incidence of suicide attempts that do not result in hospitalization. |
| 6.4 | Some concern was voiced that as individuals with mental illness overcome the stigma of seeking treatment and actually receive services that the number of individuals who report having mental illness will actually increase. The objective as currently written could be interpreted by some as working in cross purposes with case finding initiatives. However, if the objective is stated clearly as reflecting an epidemiological perspective (measuring community-based prevalence rather than clinic-based prevalence) some felt it would be appropriate. |
| 6.5 | A concern was raised about the wording of the objective. As individuals begin to understand that stress can adversely affect their health, the number of them responding affirmatively to questions about the effects of stress on health will actually increase. Therefore, several individuals suggested this objective be deleted or rewritten. |
| 6.6 | No debate. Seemed reasonable to keep unless those more familiar with new knowledge about community programs suggest a revision or addition. |
| 6.7 | Keepimportant to measure access to services |
| 6.8 | Keepimportant to measure access to services |
| 6.9 | Need to look at ways to measure it. |
| 6.10 | Delete. Needs to be rewritten using current information from those who study individuals with mental illness who are in jails. |
| 6.11 | No Comment |
| 6.12 | Delete. The target was achieved as reported in the last progress review on 7/9/96. |
| 6.13 | Suggested that the difficulty of measuring this objective be address by CMHS/NIMH Work Group. Generally the objective is acceptable if it can be measured accurately. |
| 6.14 | No comment |
| 6.15 | No comment |