
1997 Partnerships
for Networked Consumer Health Information Conference
Summaries of Plenary Sessions and
Breakout Sessions
Does it Work?
#4: And the Winners Are...
Date: Wednesday, April 16, 1997
Time: 2:00 - 3:30 PM
Moderator: Jim Hake, Chairman of the NII
Awards, Access Media, Inc.
Speaker: Karen A. Chapman, MD, MPH, Director,
Center for Health Information, Division of Public Health,
Georgia Department of Human Resources, "The Judging
Process for the NII Awards"
Speaker: George Hripcsak, MD, Principal
Investigator, Columbia University "Applied
Informatics Project - Using the NII to Coordinate Health
Care"
Speaker: David L. Rosenbloom, PhD, Project
Director, Boston University, School of Public Health,
"Join Together Online: Linking Communities Fighting
Substance Abuse"
Statement of the Subject
The National Information Infrastructure (NII) Awards
have been involved in the evaluation of innovative uses
of the information superhighway since 1995. While many
projects struggle with evaluation of their projects, the
NII Awards have created a process that identifies and
recognizes innovative leaders and thinkers who are
realizing the promise that the infostructure holds. The
NII Awards are creating a learning community of thinkers
and doers that "get it."
Key Issues, Including the Role of Technology
The NII Awards program is an educational and market
development initiative with an ulterior motive: to
recognize and reward excellence in networked
applications, namely projects and services that bring
communities together through the infostructure and
thereby show the world it can be done. The NII Awards
believe that by recognizing the best real-world
cyberspace projects, the barriers to widespread adoption
of the technologies will be pushed down. This awards
process is demonstrating that what people do given the
power of networks can change our lives, and our world,
for the better.
Roles, Responsibilities, and Priorities
The NII Awards process begins with a call for entries.
There is a call for entry in 10 categories. The entries
are qualified for the category and move to a selection
phase where judges determine who will be a semi-finalist.
Another round of judging narrows each category from 10
semifinalists to 6 finalists. The final judges review the
6 finalists in the 10 categories and a winner in each
category is selected.
The categories are Arts and Entertainment, Business,
Children, Community, Education, GII Next Generation,
Government, Health, Public Access (sponsored by the U.S.
Postal Service), and Telecollaboration (sponsored by
AT&T).
There are three Judging Criteria that are weighed
equally by the judges, and applied in the context of the
Award Category Definition.
This session describes the judging process in detail.
A 1996 Finalist Judge will describe the judging process
and experience. Two finalists in the NII Award Category
of Health, Applied Informatics-Using the NII to
Coordinate Healthcare and Join Together Online-Linking
Communities Fighting Substance Abuse, will share their
innovative projects and the evaluation experience.
Next Steps
Continue the annual NII Awards process, providing a
forum to highlight the best and the brightest in
cyberspace.

Back to Summaries and Transcripts page.
|