
1997 Partnerships
for Networked Consumer Health Information Conference
Transcripts of Plenary Sessions and
Breakout Sessions
"Implications
of The 1996 Telecommunications Act"
Tuesday, April 15
2:00-2:30 PM
Speaker: The Honorable Reed Hundt, Chairman,
Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC
Thank you very, very much. Thank you for having me and
special thanks to the Telehealth Task Force.
I would like to acknowledge the head of the Telehealth
Advisory Committee, Greg Lawler, and also Jay Sanders.
Both played key roles in telling us what to do in the
intersection of telecommunications and telehealth.
Right now in telecommunications, we are trying to
reset the rules. Sometimes the tasks seem daunting but
we're encouraged by the fact that Congress has asked us
to bring the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) into
areas we have hoped we would see developed, but that the
FCC has not been involved in before -- education and
medicine, for instance.
As a result of the Telecommunications Act that passed
last year, we need very specific help from all of you,
which we have gotten from the Advisory Committee,
regarding our policies. There has always been a
discussion about universal service, but we need to take
the discussion further. We still have gaps in service.
Telephone service is still limited in some areas, and
classrooms are still only 10 percent wired.
Particularly in the fields of education and in health,
the Telecommunications Act is very important. It shows a
revolutionary commitment by the United States. When it
comes to telecommunications, we are the envy of the rest
of the world. Everyone is trying to move from the
Industrial to the Information Age -- determining how best
to open up markets to competition. Everyone around the
world is watching the United States to see how we pull
this off. And they are watching the FCC to see if we meet
all the goals Congress has set for us.
We will do what's necessary to provide universal
service for all Americans, all classrooms, all libraries,
and all health care providers. We will deliver a
comprehensive system to connect all these groups to the
information highway. I am confident we will do the right
thing, because we are committed to meeting the goals.
The FCC's role in improving health care delivery is a
new one. Last year, we adopted guidelines to measure the
effects of wireless services on health. We provided the
forum to see what the guidelines should look like. We
also explored the impact of television on kids -- the
mental health of kids -- and studied the V-chip. For a
long time, the effects of television on children have
been dealt with by the FCC, which has worked to develop
industry standards.
Last fall, the liquor industry reversed a voluntary
ban of hard liquor ads on television. They have been
targeting programs with a large proportion of underage
viewers. This is what you want an agency to be doing --
being open to receiving input and guidance from the
public, making a report to the American people, writing
the rules on issues that people think are important. This
is how we approached the job of writing rules for
telehealth. We opened up for comment, then formed the
Advisory Committee. Now we are supposed to write the
rules that make the report relevant.
How many undiagnosed problems are there in the
unconnected parts of our society? We must make expedited
information available to the population. The FCC has the
high honor of developing the network that will provide
that information.
One of the advantages of telehealth is that it will
bring health care costs down. The FCC is working with
numerous agencies to examine its costs and benefits. The
money we spend to connect health agencies will probably
prove to be money well spent. Congress has mandated that
rural access be brought under our control. Modern
communications services must be put into place.
Telehealth and telecommunications are investments in
the future. We hope someday that every health care
provider in the world will be able to learn from the
great teaching institutions of the world. Secretary
Shalala's healthfinder web site is a wonderful
resource and will attract many, many visitors seeking
reliable health information.
Senators Snowe, Exon, and Rockefeller probably deserve
the most credit for ensuring that rural America has
access to telecommunications equal to that of urban
areas. We have received advice from several rural health
projects and are in the midst of writing the rules.
The Telecommunications Act mandates the infrastructure
to provide adequate health services. But who decides what
is adequate? I would be inclined to say that the health
care providers should be the ones to decide. Maybe there
should be a fundamental bandwidth for telehealth.
What about long distance charges? A rural provider may
have to pay a long distance charge that could run as high
as $1400 a month, while in a city that same service might
be $60. How do we compensate rural health care providers
to bring down these costs? And the Internet? Many rural
customers must pay a fee to connect over long distance.
Should rural providers get a discount or should we help
them pay the fees? It is in answering these questions and
making the best possible policy that we will find out if
we have done the right thing.
Your help will make sure that these problems are
solved. Thank you.
Audience: It is not a good idea to pay long
distance access charges to a company.
Audience: Could you explain how we will be
paying for the services that will be provided under
universal service?
Hundt: Not you, sir -- on a general level, we
would take all of the telecommunications revenue and
redistribute it to specific consortiums or companies that
the school would choose as providers. These revenues are
about $200 billion, and only a couple percent of that
would provide for universal service.
Audience: There is one important group that you
do not have on your list. Many public health and disease
control agencies do not have access to the web, and need
your assistance.
Hundt: In fact, rural public health agencies
are specifically included in the 1996 act.

Back to Summaries
and Transcripts page.
|