65. Childhood Immunizations RECOMMENDATION All children without established contraindications should receive diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP), oral poliovirus (OPV), measles-mumps-rubella (MMR), conjugate Haemophilus influenzae type b, hepatitis B, and varicella vaccines, in accordance with recommended schedules (see Clinical Intervention). Hepatitis A vaccine is recommended for children and adolescents at high risk for hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection. Pneumococcal vaccine and annual influenza vaccine are recommended for children and adolescents at high risk (see Clinical Intervention and Chapter 66). See Chapter 67 for recommendations on postexposure prophylaxis against selected infectious diseases, and Chapter 25 for recommendations regarding the Bacille Calmette-GuÇrin (BCG) vaccine. Burden of Suffering A number of infectious diseases are preventable through routine childhood immunizations. Largely as a result of widespread childhood vaccination over the past several decades, diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, poliomyelitis, measles, mumps, rubella, and congenital rubella syndrome have become remarkably less common in the U.S. than in prevaccination years, and the numbers of cases reported are at or near the lowest levels ever.1 Comparisons of the total numbers of reported cases in the U.S. in 1994 and in the years preceding vaccination reveal an impressive decrease in reported cases of diphtheria (from 9,493 [1948] to 2 cases), tetanus (from 601 [1948] to 51 cases), paralytic poliomyelitis (from 18,308 [1954] to 0 cases due to endemic wild virus), measles (from 481,530 [1962] to 963 cases), mumps (from 152,209 [1968] to 1,537 cases), rubella (from 57,686 [1969] to 227 cases), and congenital rubella syndrome (from 77 [1970] to 7 cases).2,2a Before the introduction of poliovirus vaccine in 1955, polio occurred in epidemic waves of increasing magnitude, reaching a peak incidence of more than 20,000 paralytic cases in 1952.3 The last outbreak, in 1979, totaled only 10 paralytic cases. Although the number of pertussis cases has also declined markedly since the prevaccination years (from 74,715 [1948] to 4,617 cases), long-term trends suggest an overall increase in the reported incidence of pertussis since 1976, rising from 0.5/100,000 to 2.6/100,000 in 1993 and 1.8/100,000 in 1994.4,4a Many of these cases occurred in unvaccinated or inadequately vaccinated infants and children. Newer childhood vaccines include H. influenzae type b (Hib), hepatitis B, hepatitis A, and varicella vaccines. Systemic illness from Hib disease, including meningitis, pneumonia, arthritis, and epiglottitis, previously occurred before age 5 in about 1 of every 200 children born in the U.S.5 The highest rates of Hib disease in the U.S. have been reported in Alaska Native and certain Native American populations. The incidence of invasive Hib disease in children <5 years old declined by an estimated 95% (from 41 to 2/100,000) between 1987, when the first Hib vaccine was licensed, and 1994.6,6a Children less than 5 years old account for only 1% of reported cases of hepatitis B and 1-3% of the 200,000 to 300,000 hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections estimated to occur annually in the U.S., but 20-30% of chronic infections.7 The likelihood of developing chronic infection has been estimated to be 80-90% in perinatally infected neonates, decreasing to 25% for those infected at age 5, and to <10% for infected adults.8 Chronic infection can lead to severe complications including chronic active hepatitis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma.9-11 Nearly 27,000 cases of hepatitis A were reported in the U.S. in 1994 (10.3/100,000),2a although the actual number of cases is estimated to be several times higher.9 Children aged 5-14 years have the highest rate of reported hepatitis A (about 15 cases per 100,000 in 1993).2 About half of reported cases of hepatitis in the U.S. are attributable to hepatitis A.9 High-risk groups include travelers to countries with intermediate or high hepatitis A endemicity,12 some religious communities, and Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, and Native American populations; persons institutionalized for custodial care may also have an increased risk. Day care centers may be an important source of epidemic HAV infection.13 Because chickenpox, caused by infection with varicella-zoster virus (VZV), infects nearly everyone by adulthood, its annual incidence approximates the birth cohort (4 million in 1993).14,15 At least 90% of cases occur in children less than 15 years old.14 Most adults are immune.16 Although generally mild in healthy children, chickenpox often results in missed school days for the child, missed work days for their parents, and visits to health care providers, and it occasionally leads to serious complications (e.g., encephalitis, pneumonia, bacterial superinfection), hospitalizations, and, rarely, death.14,17-20 Complication rates per case of varicella and case-fatality rates are substantially higher for older adolescents and adults than for children.14,17 Infants are also at high risk of complications. Efficacy of Vaccines DTP Vaccine. The efficacy of the DTP vaccine is established on the basis of clinical studies and decades of experience with universal childhood immunization.21-24 Substantial declines in diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis disease followed the introduction of whole-cell pertussis vaccine combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids in the late 1940s.24,25 The diphtheria and tetanus toxoids are generally safe and are most commonly associated with self-limited local reactions,26 although case reports have described allergic or Arthus-like reactions and peripheral neuropathy following frequent tetanus boosters. Anaphylaxis occurs in rare instances.27-29 Increased attention has focused in recent years on the efficacy and safety of the pertussis component of the vaccine.30-32 In a national surveillance study of households with laboratory-confirmed pertussis, the efficacy of currently used whole-cell pertussis vaccines in fully vaccinated (three or more doses) children 1 through 4 years of age was estimated to be 59- 89% for prolonged cough, 78% for typical paroxysmal cough, and 96-97% for severe clinical illness.22 In another national surveillance study, vaccine efficacy in preventing pertussis, defined as either any culture-proven cough illness or typical pertussis illness, was 64% for three doses and 82% for four or more doses.4a The whole-cell preparation commonly produces local redness, swelling, and pain, and systemic events such as fever, fretfulness, and protracted, inconsolable crying.33 DTP has also been associated with more serious adverse events such as febrile seizures in about 57/100,000 doses and hypotonic/hyporesponsive episodes in 3.5- 291/100,000 doses.33 The risk of seizures may be higher in certain children, such as those with a personal or family history of seizures.34,35 Limited follow-up of such cases, however, suggests that most, if not all, are associated with benign outcomes.36,37 The National Childhood Encephalopathy Study (NCES), a large British case-control study, reported that pertussis-containing vaccines were associated with more severe neurologic illnesses at a rate of 6.8 per million doses (95% CI, 2.1-15.9 per million), including acute encephalopathy in 2.7 (0-10.5) per million doses.38 A 10-year follow-up study reported an association between death or permanent neurologic dysfunction and DTP vaccine only among children who had developed a serious acute neurologic illness within 7 days of receiving DTP.39 The NCES has been criticized for possible bias and error in case ascertainment and other methodologic problems.33 Detailed analysis of this and other controlled and uncontrolled observational studies led the Institute of Medicine t conclude that evidence was consistent with (but did not establish) a causal relationship between DTP vaccine and acute encephalopathy, with a range of excess risk between 0 and 10.5 per million doses,33 and between DTP and chronic neurologic dysfunction in those rare children who experienced a serious acute neurologic illness within 7 days after receiving DTP.40 The incidence of serious neurologic disorders following DTP administration is substantially less than that following pertussis disease.38 Nevertheless, the high rate of adverse local and mild systemic reactions, as well as the possibility of rare adverse neurologic sequelae, has stimulated interest in development of less reactogenic vaccines.41 Acellular forms of pertussis vaccine induce fewer local and systemic side effects than does the whole cell vaccine when administered to infants and children up to 6 years old.42-48 In a randomized placebo-controlled trial of 3,801 Swedish children aged 5-11 months, the efficacy of two acellular pertussis vaccines was 79-80% in preventing severe culture-proven pertussis and 54-69% for preventing culture-proven cases with any cough.49-51 Four-year follow-up indicates persistent efficacy ranging from 69% to 95%, depending on case definition.52 Household exposure studies in Japan have reported efficacy >90% against typical pertussis among children receiving acellular vaccines at age Ú2 years.53-55a In a prospective institutional exposure study, children vaccinated with acellular pertussis-component DTP (DTaP) beginning at a median age of 5 months (range, 3-26) were significantly less likely to develop typical pertussis symptoms compared with unvaccinated children.56 None of these studies directly compared the acellular vaccine to the whole-cell vaccine. Immunogenicity appears comparable to the whole cell vaccine for the antigens present in the acellular vaccines.44,57 Preliminary results from two European randomized, double-blind trials indicate that DTaP at 2, 4, and 6 months of age was at least as efficacious as DTP with significantly fewer side effects; DTaP is likely to be licensed for use in infancy in the near future (personal communication, John R. La Montagne, PhD, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Aug. 15, 1995). DTaP is currently licensed in the U.S. for use in children Ú15 months of age as the fourth and/or fifth doses of the recommended DTP series.58,59 OPV Vaccine. Three doses of live oral poliovirus (OPV) vaccine offers protection against all three poliovirus types in 95-100% of children. As a result, disease caused by indigenous wild poliovirus has been eliminated in the U.S.60 An estimated 1 out of every 2.5 million vaccine doses results in paralytic poliomyelitis, however, and all cases of endemic paralytic poliomyelitis in the U.S. since 1980 (about eight cases per year) have been associated with the vaccine.60 The vaccine has also resulted in several cases of fatal vaccine-strain poliovirus infections, primarily in immunocompromised patients.29 The licensing of enhanced-potency inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV), which has no documented serious adverse effects and appears to have comparable immunogenicity,61,62 has led some to propose replacment of the live vaccine with this product.63 IPV may be less effective, however, in limiting transmission of wild poliovirus among susceptible members of the population.64 OPV has few significant adverse effects other than the risk of paralytic poliomyelitis.29 The rare occurrence of Guillain-BarrÇ syndrome (GBS) was associated with a one-time OPV mass vaccination program in controlled studies in Finland, where IPV had been used routinely.29 A retrospective epidemiologic survey of GBS in southern California, however, found no correlation between the usual age of OPV immunization and the incidence of GBS.65 Because it requires injection, IPV is associated with greater discomfort and possibly greater administrative costs than is OPV. Combining IPV with other infant vaccines66,67 would alleviate this problem. MMR Vaccine. A single dose of MMR is highly protective against measles, mumps, and rubella and its widespread use has resulted in substantial declines in the incidence of all three diseases.2,68 It is generally associated with only mild adverse effects in healthy individuals.68,69 MMR vaccine rarely causes thrombocytopenia (2.5-3.3/100,000 vaccinated persons), urticaria (0.6/100,000), and anaphylaxis (estimated at 0.1-5/100,000).29,70 Several deaths from vaccine-strain viral infection have been reported, all in severely immunocompromised children; none has been reported in children infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).29 The efficacy and adverse effects of rubella vaccine are described in detail in Chapter 32. Despite the efficacy and safety of the vaccine, measles remains an important public health problem in the U.S. due to failure to immunize and to immunization failure. Between 1989 and 1994, 27- 64% of measles cases occurred among unvaccinated but vaccine-eligible persons and 19-22% among persons who had received one vaccine after 12 months of age (immunization failure).71- 72a Most immunization failures appear to occur in children who fail to respond to the vaccine (primary immunization failure), an estimated 5% of children immunized after 15 months of age.73,74 In the past, the rate of primary immunization failure has been higher among children vaccinated before 15 months of age, presumably because maternal antibody interfered with response.75 More recent studies indicate excellent serologic response and similar clinical efficacy in children vaccinated at 12-14 months, perhaps because maternal antibody levels achieved in a vaccinated cohort of mothers decline earlier than levels achieved by natural infection.76-82 Antibody response remains lower than when the vaccine is given at 15 months, however. Current evidence indicates that revaccination of primary immunization failures results in seroconversion rates comparable to that of never vaccinated persons83 and prevents measles outbreaks.84 Although some evidence suggests that waning immunity (secondary immunization failure) may also be a factor in immunization failure,85-91 seropositivity rates generally remain high at least 10-15 years following vaccination,92-94 anamnestic antibody responses occur in vaccinated persons who apparently lack antibody,83,93 and cohorts of known seroconverters followed through time in Great Britain and Japan have shown little evidence of increasing disease incidence with time since immunization.93 In 27-year follow-up of a British vaccine trial, there was no significant decline in vaccine efficacy with time (although the number of cases was quite small).95 Because of immunization failures, a two-dose vaccination protocol against measles appears necessary to eliminate transmission of this highly communicable disease.88,96-98 Indirect evidence in support of a two-dose regimen comes from studies showing that attack rates during outbreaks are lower among populations of individuals who have had two doses of vaccine,82,88- 91,99 and from the rarity of reported measles cases among persons who had received two doses of vaccine.72,72a In Finland, a two-dose vaccination program administered at 14-18 months and at 6 years (with >95% coverage), along with "catch-up" vaccination for children 11-13 years and for individuals at occupational risk, has essentially eliminated indigenous measles, mumps, and rubella.70 Adverse reactions to a second dose of vaccine seem to be no more common than to the first. Hib Vaccine. The efficacy of a capsular polysaccharide (polyribosyl-ribitol phosphate [PRP]) vaccine in preventing infection with Hib in children over age 2 was first demonstrated in Finland in 1984.100 Newer vaccines with substantially improved immunogenicity were subsequently developed by covalently conjugating PRP with protein antigens and were licensed for use in children 15-18 months of age in the late 1980s. Postlicensure studies have indicated vaccine efficacy of 74-88% for children 18-59 months of age.101-103 Licensure of Hib conjugate vaccines for infants under 6 months of age followed demonstration of 93% efficacy of two doses of PRP-OMP conjugate vaccine in a randomized trial, and 100% efficacy of three doses of Hib oligosaccharide conjugate (HbOC) in a quasi-randomized trial.104-106 A postlicensure case-control study reported protective efficacies of 71%, 89%, and 94% after one, two, and three doses, respectively, of HbOC.107 Although U.S. controlled trials of a third vaccine (PRP-T) were terminated after the licensure of other Hib conjugate vaccines for use in infancy, no cases of invasive Hib disease were reported among more than 6,200 vaccine recipients at the time of termination,108 and protective efficacy has been reported from a British trial in which infants were given this vaccine at 2, 3, and 4 months,109 and from a Finnish immunization program using historical controls.110 A combined DTP-HbOC vaccine and use of PRP-T vaccine reconstituted with DTP (from a single manufacturer) have been licensed based on immunogenicity similar to that of the individual vaccines, although no clinical efficacy information is available.111,112 These combined vaccines allow a reduced number of injections when both vaccines are indicated. Other combination vaccines are currently being evaluated.113 Declines in antibody levels occur with all vaccines after administration of the primary series, but booster vaccination at Ú12 months of age elicits a good antibody response.114-116 Surveillance in a number of different populations indicates a 55-95% decline in the incidence of Hib disease with widespread use of Hib conjugate vaccines.6,117-122 A substantial decline in the incidence of Hib disease among unvaccinated children120 and in persons Ú5 years6 may be due to reduced carriage and transmission of the bacteria from vaccinated children.123,124 In randomized controlled trials, serial combinations of different vaccines (PRP-OMP, HbOC, or PRP-T) were as safe and at least as immunogenic as single conjugate vaccine series, supporting the interchangeability of these vaccines.125-127 Adverse effects of the Hib vaccine are generally mild (local tenderness, redness and swelling, irritability, fever, malaise, etc.).128 Hepatitis B Vaccine. In the U.S., infants born to hepatitis B surface antigen-positive (HBsAg+) mothers are at high risk of becoming infected with HBV, but most other infants have little risk of infection before adolescence. Controlled trials,129-135a cohort studies,136,137 and a time series study,138 have demonstrated that hepatitis B vaccine given alone to infants of HBsAg+ mothers is 62-92% effective (depending on dosage, interval, vaccine, and maternal antigen status) in preventing the development of the HBV chronic carrier state during the first 1-5 years of life. The protective efficacy of vaccine combined with hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) is somewhat higher (85-95%) than for vaccine alone in these infants (see Chapter 24). Because universal vaccination of low-risk infants has only been introduced recently in the U.S., its ability to protect these infants later in life must be inferred from studies in other populations. From controlled trials139-141 and time series studies142-147 conducted in populations where horizontal HBV transmission is common, universal vaccination of infants, children, and/or adolescents with a three- or four-dose regimen is estimated to be >84% effective in preventing HBV infection and >80% effective in preventing the development of chronic HBV carriage. Mass vaccination of children in New Zealand142 and infants in Taiwan,148 American Samoa,149 and Alaska Native communities150 has led to substantial reductions in acute HBV events and the prevalence of chronic infection in both vaccinated and unvaccinated populations. Controlled trials and time series indicate protection against HBV infection and chronic carriage lasting from 3 to as long as 11-12 years in vaccinated infants, children, and adolescents, despite declines in antibody levels. 130,142,143, 146,151-155 Breakthrough infections appear to be associated more with low initial antibody response than with declining antibody levels.139,146,156 The recombinant vaccines currently in use in the U.S. induce antibody responses and short-term (up to 5 years) efficacy in children similar to those of the plasma-derived vaccine.131,133,138,142,147,157- 163 Mild reactions_including local soreness and induration, low-grade fever, irritability, and poor feeding_are reported by the parents of up to 13% of vaccinated children and 4-7% of vaccinated infants.161,162,164 There have been several case reports of nonfatal anaphylaxis from recombinant hepatitis B vaccine.29 Hepatitis A Vaccine. Inactivated hepatitis A vaccine, delivered in two doses 1 month apart, protected against hepatitis A for at least 1 year in a double-blind randomized controlled trial in more than 30,000 Thai children aged 1-16 years.165 Protective efficacy was 94% at 12 months, and 100% at 17.5 months after a booster dose at 12 months. After the trial ended, all controls received two doses of the vaccine and were followed for an additional 10 months. The subsequent attack rate was 6 cases per 100,000, compared to 114 cases per 100,000 in this control group during the same interval while the trial was ongoing, and to 52-101 cases per 100,000 in historical controls. In a smaller U.S. trial of healthy children aged 2-16 years, a single dose of a different inactivated vaccine was 100% efficacious (lower bound 87%) in preventing hepatitis A at mean 103-day follow-up.166 In other high-risk populations, seroconversion rates of 82-95% after one dose and 100% after two to three doses of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine have been reported in children ranging in age from 1 to 15 years.167-169 Although the duration of clinical immunity has not been established, protective levels of antibody have been shown to persist at least four years after administration of three doses of vaccine.170- 173 Estimates derived from models of antibody decline after vaccination predict that protective levels of antibody could last for at least 20 years.170 Vaccine efficacy is low in the first week after vaccination, rising to 77-90% at 2 weeks and 90-100% at 3-4 weeks.166,174-176,179 To provide immediate protection for those at high risk of exposure (e.g., travelers to endemic areas), administration of immune globulin (IG) with the first vaccine dose may be necessary. Although several studies have reported lower mean antibody titers when the vaccine is administered concomitantly with IG, vaccine seroconversion rates appear to be comparable.177,179 In direct comparisons with IG, traditionally used as preexposure prophylaxis against hepatitis A for high-risk persons such as international travelers (see Chapter 67), thevaccine led to higher and longer-lasting antibody titers.178-184 The reported 94-100% protective efficacy of hepatitis A vaccine is higher than that reported for IG (80- 90%) (see Chapter 67), but the clinical efficacies of the two interventions have not been directly compared in clinical trials. Adverse effects of the vaccine, including mild local reactions (pain, tenderness, redness, and swelling) and minor systemic symptoms such as fever, headache, and malaise, occur in 10-30% of recipients, and are more common after the second and third doses.165-167,169 Serious allergic reactions, without long-term consequences, have been reported rarely in temporal association with hepatitis A vaccination.12 Varicella Vaccine. The efficacy of a live attenuated Oka strain varicella-zoster vaccine was 98% in preventing chickenpox through two varicella seasons in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in healthy children and adolescents aged 1-14 years.185,186 Other studies in children and adolescents have compared the attack rate after household or other close exposure to that of historical controls and estimated vaccine efficacy at 86-98%.186-190 Breakthrough infections occur at a rate of about 1-2% per year, but illness is attenuated, with fewer lesions and a reduced incidence of fever compared to natural infections.186,191,192 Protective efficacy and antibody levels have been shown to persist for at least 7-10 years.186,193 In a 17-20-year follow-up study, only 2 of 96 adults who received vaccine in childhood (age 10 months to 13 years) developed breakthrough infections (both mild cases), despite 100 documented episodes of contact with persons infected with VZV.194 Antibody levels were higher than those observed 10 years earlier. It is unclear what effect immune boosting caused by reinfection with wild-type VZV had on the level or duration of protection against disease. The vaccine has been less well studied in older adolescents and adults than in children. Adolescents Ú13 years and adults have a poorer immune response to the varicella vaccine, and two doses are required to achieve optimal seroconversion rates.187,190,195 A hospital and household exposure study, conducted in health care workers and parents of young children, reported a protective efficacy of only 50%, but all breakthrough infections were mild.196 Adverse effects of the vaccine have included injection site reactions and, less commonly, varicella-like rashes and fever.185,187,190 Experience with substantially greater numbers of vaccine recipients would be required to rule out rare, serious adverse reactions. Mild herpes zoster has been reported in several healthy children after varicella vaccine, but it appears to occur at a reduced rate compared to that associated with natural varicella,197 as has been demonstrated for vaccinated children with leukemia.198,199 Herpes zoster has been reported in one adult recipient of the vaccine.200 The most important potential adverse consequence of universal preschool varicella vaccination is a shift of the age distribution of cases into adulthood, when the disease is more severe.14,17 Such a shift would occur if immunity from childhood vaccination wanes in adulthood, or if a large number of older children enter adolescence and adulthood without having been vaccinated and without having acquired natural immunity to VZV because of reduced circulation of wild virus. An age-structured theoretical transmission model suggests, however, that over a plausible range of values for vaccine efficacy, duration of immunity, and levels of coverage, routine immunization of preschool children would greatly reduce the number of primary varicella cases and would therefore reduce overall morbidity (as measured by hospitalizations) despite a shift in the age distribution of cases.201 This model also suggests that "catch-up" immunization of 12-year-olds for the first 11 years of the vaccination program would reduce the likelihood that a large pool of susceptible adolescents and adults would be created by universal preschool vaccination. Recommendations of Other Groups Recommendations on the administration of childhood vaccines are issued regularly by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP),202,203 the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP),13 and the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP).204 These three groups, working with federal agencies, have approved a unified childhood immunization schedule.205 The recommendations for the vaccines in the synthesized schedule are generally similar to those recommended by the Task Force(see Clinical Intervention), except: giving a second dose of MMR at either age 4-6 or 11-12 years is considered equally acceptable in this schedule, whereas the Task Force recommends 4-6 years as the preferred age (see Discussion); and routine hepatitis B vaccine was recommended only in infancy in the unified schedule, whereas the Task Force also recommends its routine use in all children and adolescents not previously immunized. ACIP and AAP have subsequently revised their recommendations for hepatitis B vaccine to include all children aged 11-12 years who have not previously been vaccinated; ACIP also recommends vaccinating unimmunized children under 11 years who are Pacific Islanders or who reside in households of first-generation immigrants from countries with high or intermediate HBV endemicity.206,216 ACIP and AAP recommend one dose of varicella vaccine for all healthy children age 12 months to the 13th birthday who have not been previously immunized and who lack a reliable history of varicella, with a target age of 12-18 months for routine vaccination; two doses of vaccine 4-8 weeks apart are recommended for susceptible adolescents aged Ú13 years.207,207a AAP recommends optional serologic testing in healthy adolescents older than 18 years who lack a history of varicella.207 Recommendations for the use of varicella vaccine are being developed by AAFP and other organizations. The Food and Drug Administration has approved inactivated hepatitis A vaccine for use in selected groups including travelers, military personnel, and laboratory workers.208 Recommendations for the use of hepatitis A vaccine in children are being developed by ACIP, AAP, AAFP, and other groups. ACIP has issued recommendations for the use of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine for susceptible persons aged Ú2 years traveling to or working in countries with intermediate or high HAV endemicity.208a Discussion All of the vaccines licensed for routine use in children have been proved efficacious in controlled studies or multiple time series. Those that have been in widespread use for some years (diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, polio, measles, mumps, rubella, Hib) have already demonstrated a dramatic effect on the incidence of childhood disease. In the case of polio, more than a decade has passed since the last documented transmission of wild poliovirus in the U.S., and more recently poliomyelitis has been eradicated in the entire Western hemisphere.209 Global eradication efforts are now concentrated on interrupting transmission in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. All cases of endemic paralytic poliomyelitis in the U.S. are now caused by vaccine-strain poliovirus infections, indicating that there may be a benefit from replacing OPV with enhanced-potency IPV. The use of combination vaccines that include IPV may reduce the costs and adverse effects associated with adding another injection to the infant vaccine schedule. Such combination vaccines are not yet available in the U.S. Whether universal hepatitis B and varicella vaccination will lead to benefits similar to those attributable to previously approved vaccines is unknown. Their appropriateness for routine use in healthy children is a policy decision that must take into account other issues in addition to vaccine efficacy, including cost-effectiveness, available resources, and competing priorities. Routine infant vaccination against hepatitis B in the U.S. has been recommended primarily as a way to prevent HBV infection in adolescents and adults, but this benefit has not yet been documented. Universal vaccination in early adolescence (e.g., age 11-12) would be effective in preventing adolescent HBV infection, but it would not prevent transmission in early childhood, when the risk of developing chronic carriage is highest and which continued to occur in the U.S. despite selective vaccination of infants born to HBsAg+ mothers. One cost-effectiveness analysis reported an incremental cost of universal newborn vaccination relative to screening pregnant women and selective vaccination of high-risk newborns to be $30,347 per discounted life-year gained, which is comparable to that of other health care strategies commonly used in North America, such as treatment for mild hypertension.210 Another cost-effectiveness analysis211 reported that screening all pregnant women and giving vaccine plus HBIG to neonates of HBsAg+ mothers (as currently recommended in Chapter 24), combined with universal vaccination of children at age 10 with a booster at age 20, was more cost-effective than universal vaccination of newborns (with boosters at age 10 and 20) or universal vaccination of adolescents at age 10 (with a booster at age 20) without screening in pregnancy. This analysis did not account, however, for the consequences of horizontal transmission and consequent chronic infection during childhood. A cost-effectiveness analysis has evaluated prevaccination testing for hepatitis B in adolescents or preadolescents; this strategy was not effective in term of cost or rate of completed vaccination unless the seroprevalence of antibodies to HBsAg was at least 40% (also see Chapter 24).211a For varicella vaccine, there are few data regarding protective efficacy beyond about 10 years after vaccination. The likely change in VZV epidemiology as a result of universal childhood immunization, i.e., that chickenpox would occur primarily in adulthood when it tends to be more severe, remains an important concern. While the previously cited model201 found that the overall effect of universal preschool vaccination would be beneficial, longer experience will be necessary to demonstrate this. Cost effectiveness analysis suggests that routine vaccination for preschool-age children results in cost savings when the analysis includes both direct medical costs and indirect costs (i.e., current work-loss of parents and of infected adults, and future work-loss of those who die or who are permanently disabled from encephalitis).212 Vaccination before age 13 is preferable because two doses 4-8 weeks apart are required to achieve optimal seroconversion rates when the vaccine is given after age 12. The use of combined vaccines (e.g., MMRV,213,214 which is not currently available in the U.S.) would reduce the number of injections needed, reducing the adverse effects associated with multiple needlesticks and potentially reducing costs. Vaccinating all adolescents and adults with a negative or uncertain history of chickenpox is likely to be more effective in preventing chickenpox than serologic testing followed by immunization of test-negative adolescents and adults, because with the latter strategy, loss to follow-up and false-positive test results will reduce the proportion protected. Serologic testing prior to vaccination may be more cost-effective, however, because many adolescents and most adults with negative or uncertain histories of chickenpox are in fact immune, and because the need for two doses to be given at two separate visits increases the costs of vaccination.215 Recommendations have been made to give a second MMR dose at either 4-6 years or 11-12 years.205 Giving the second dose at 4-6 years has two apparent advantages: primary immunization failures are corrected sooner and the health care and school systems are poised to capture the most individuals for immunization at the time of school entry. The advantage of a dose at 11-12 years is that it should have a more immediate impact on outbreaks involving middle, junior high, and high schools, and colleges. Studies directly comparing different two-dose schedules are under way. The weight of the currently available evidence would not appear to favor delaying the second dose into late childhood with the intent of preventing secondary immunization failure. Efforts should be made, however, to vaccinate all children aged 11-12 years who have not previously received a second dose of MMR. CLINICAL INTERVENTION All children without established contraindications should receive diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP), oral poliovirus (OPV), measles-mumps-rubella (MMR), conjugate H. influenzae type b (Hib), hepatitis B, and varicella vaccines ("A" recommendation). The recommended childhood immunization schedule includes DTP vaccine at ages 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months; DTP at 12-18 months or DTaP at 15-18 months; and DTP or DTaP between ages 4 and 6 years, just prior to school entry. A combined tetanus-diphtheria (Td) booster should be administered at age 11-12 years (14-16 years is an acceptable alternative) and periodically in adulthood (see Chapter 66). OPV vaccine is recommended at ages 2 months, 4 months, 6-18 months, and 4-6 years. MMR vaccine should be administered at age 12-15 months and again at 4-6 years of age; 11-12 years is an acceptable alternative for the second dose. Giving the first dose at 15 months may be preferable when compliance with a visit at this age is assured, because efficacy and immunogenicity are slightly higher than at 12 months. Children over 6 years of age who present for care and have not yet received two doses of measles vaccine should be vaccinated with MMR, with the goal that all children will have had two doses of measles or MMR vaccine by 11-12 years of age. Hib conjugate vaccine should be given at 2, 4, and 6 months (HbOC or PRP-T) or 2 and 4 months (PRP-OMP), with a booster dose at 12-15 months of age using any of the conjugate vaccines. While giving a single conjugate Hib vaccine for the primary series is preferred because of proven clinical efficacy, there is good evidence for the safety and immunogenicity of heterogenous Hib conjugate vaccine series. Therefore, immunization at the recommended intervals (2, 4, 6, and 12-15 months) should not be delayed by efforts to determine the type of vaccine previously received. When this information is unavailable, any of the conjugate vaccines approved for use in infants may be given to complete the series. Licensed combined vaccines (e.g., DTP-HbOC [Tetrammune]*) may be substituted for the relevant individual vaccines in cases where both vaccines would normally be given in order to reduce the total number of injections given. Hepatitis B vaccine is recommended for all infants, and for all children and adolescents not previously immunized, particularly those in high-risk populations (see Chapters 24 and 66). For infants, the first dose is recommended at 0-2 months (preferably prior to hospital discharge), the second dose 1-2 months after the first, and the third dose at 6-18 months (preferably at least 4 months after the second dose). Giving hepatitis B vaccine at 0, 1, 2, and 12 months of age is also acceptable. After infancy, the vaccine schedule is at the current visit and 1 and 6 months latter. Clinicians may wish to inform parents that booster doses may be required in the future to maintain immunity through adolescence and adulthood. Varicella vaccine, administered subcutaneously in one 0.5-mL dose, is recommended for routine use in healthy children 12-18 months of age, and in children under age 13 with no reliable history of varicella infection or previous immunization. Clinicians should inform parents that varicella disease in adulthood is associated with increased risk of serious complications, the duration of immunity provided by varicella vaccine has not been established, and booster doses of the vaccine may be required to maintain protection throughout adulthood. Two doses of vaccine delivered 4-8 weeks apart are recommended for healthy adolescents Ú13 years of age with no reliable history of varicella infection or previous vaccination. Given the relatively high prevalence of immunity in adolescents with no history of chickenpox and the results of cost-effectiveness analysis, clinicians may wish to offer serologic testing for varicella susceptibility to history-negative adolescents Ú13 years who are likely to comply with return visits. Clinicians may wish to conduct an assessment of immunization status for all children at age 11- 12, in particular to determine whether the patient needs Td, MMR, varicella, or hepatitis B vaccines. Clinicians are referred to published guidelines for details on vaccine contraindications, instructions for immunizing children with medical disorders (including human immunodeficiency virus infection), and modified protocols recommended during community outbreaks or epidemics or for children with delayed immunization.13,202 Hepatitis A vaccine is recommended for all high-risk children aged Ú2 years and all high-risk adolescents ("A" recommendation). High-risk groups include persons living in, traveling to, or working in areas where the disease is endemic and periodic outbreaks occur (e.g., countries with high or intermediate endemicity, Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, and Native American communities, certain religious communities) (see Chapter 66 for additional high-risk groups and recommendations for adult immunization). Hepatitis A vaccination may also be considered for institutionalized persons (e.g., those living in chronic care facilities). Where tracking or identification of high-risk patients is not practical or cost-effective, universal vaccination may be a reasonable policy given the minimal adverse consequences of the vaccine. At this writing, the only licensed hepatitis A vaccine is Havrix (SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals).* Three doses (360 ELISA units/dose), administered intramuscularly, are recommended for persons aged 2-18 years; the second and third doses are given 1 and 6-12 months after the first dose. The need for periodic booster doses has not been established. For persons requiring immediate protection against hepatitis A (e.g., travelers to high-risk areas who have not previously been vaccinated), IG (0.02 mL/kg) should be given simultaneously with the first dose of hepatitis A vaccine, although the clinical efficacy of this approach has not been established. IG can also be recommended as an efficacious intervention for short-term (Û5-6 months) preexposure prophylaxis against hepatitis A (see Chapter 67). While some evidence suggests that the vaccine may be more efficacious than IG, the clinical efficacies of the two regimens have not been directly compared in clinical trials. Other factors to consider in choosing between the two interventions are patient preference, the likely frequency and duration of exposure, the need for immediate protection, and cost. Annual influenza vaccine is recommended for adolescents and children Ú6 months of age who are residents of chronic care facilities or have chronic cardiopulmonary disorders, metabolic diseases (including diabetes mellitus), hemoglobinopathies, immunosuppression, or renal dysfunction ("B" recommendation) (see Chapter 66 for the review of evidence regarding influenza vaccine). Split-virus vaccine is recommended for children Û12 years; the recommended vaccine dose is 0.25 mL for children 6-35 months of age and 0.5 mL for children Ú3 years of age.13 Amantadine and rimantadine prophylaxis against influenza A is discussed in Chapter 66. Pneumococcal vaccine is recommended for immunocompetent adolescents and children (Ú2 years of age) with chronic cardiac or pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, and anatomic asplenia (excluding sickle cell disease), and those living in special environments or social settings with an identified increased risk of pneumococcal disease (e.g., certain Native American and Alaska Native populations) ("B" recommendation) (see Chapter 66 for the review of evidence regarding pneumococcal vaccine). Routine revaccination is not recommended, but it may be appropriate to consider periodic revaccination in immunocompetent individuals at highest risk for morbidity and mortality from pneumococcal disease (e.g., those with severe chronic disease) who were vaccinated more than 5 years previously. There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against pneumococcal vaccine as an efficacious vaccine for immunocompromised children Ú2 years of age, but recommendations for vaccinating these persons may be made on other grounds, including high incidence and mortality rates of pneumococcal disease and minimal adverse effects from vaccine ("C" recommendation). Examples of immunocompromised conditions associated with high risk for pneumococcal disease include acquired or congenital immunodeficiency (including HIV infection), sickle cell disease, nephrotic syndrome, chronic renal failure, metastatic or hematologic malignancy, and other conditions associated with immunosuppression, such as organ transplant. It may be appropriate to consider periodic revaccination in these patients, who are likely to have poor initial antibody response and rapid decline of antibodies after vaccination. See Chapter 25 (screening for tuberculous infection) for recommendations regarding the BCG vaccine. Recommendations on postexposure prophylaxis against selected infectious diseases, including tetanus, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, and Hib, are given in Chapter 67. The draft update of this chapter was prepared for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force by Carolyn DiGuiseppi, MD, MPH, based in part on background papers on measles and Hib vaccines prepared by Modena Wilson, MD, MPH, and Donald Robinson, MD, MPH. REFERENCES 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Reported vaccine-preventable disease_United States, 1993, and the Childhood Immunization Initiative. MMWR 1994;43:57- 60. 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Summary of notifiable diseases, United States, 1993. MMWR 1994;42:1-73. 2a. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Final 1994 reports of notifiable diseases. MMWR 1995;44:537-543. 3. Langmuir AD. Inactivated virus vaccines: protective efficacy. In: International Poliomyelitis Congress. Poliomyelitis. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1961:240-256. 4. Davis SF, Strebel PM, Cochi SL, et al. Pertussis surveillance_United States, 1989- 1991. MMWR 1992;41(SS-8):11-19. 4a. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pertussis_United States, January 1992- June 1995. MMWR 1995;44:525-529. 5. Cochi SL, Broome CV, Hightower AW. Immunization of children with Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine: a cost-effectiveness model of strategy assessment. JAMA 1985;253:521-529. 6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Progress toward elimination of Haemophilus influenzae type b disease among infants and children_United States, 1987-1993. MMWR 1994;43:144-148. 6a. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Progress toward elimination of Haemophilus influenzae type b disease among infants and children_United States, 1993-1994. MMWR 1995;44:545-550. 7. Margolis HS, Alter MJ, Hadler SC. Hepatitis B: evolving epidemiology and implications for control. Semin Liver Dis 1991;11:84-92. 8. Edmunds WJ, Medley GF, Nokes DJ, et al. The influence of age on the development of the hepatitis B carrier states. Proc R Soc Lond 1993;253:197-201. 9. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Protection against viral hepatitis. MMWR 1990;39:1-26. 10. Sakuma K, Takhara T, Okuda K, et al. Prognosis of hepatitis B virus surface antigen carriers in relation to routine liver function tests: a prospective study. Gastroenterology 1982;83:114-117. 11. Lo KJ, Tong MJ, Chien MC, et al. The natural course of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive chronic active hepatitis in Taiwan. J Infect Dis 1982;146:205-210. 12. Steffen R, Kane MA, Shapiro CN, et al. Epidemiology and prevention of hepatitis A in travelers. JAMA 1994;272:885-889. 13. American Academy of Pediatrics. 1994 Red Book: report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 23rd ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics, 1994. 14. Preblud SR. Varicella: complications and costs. Pediatrics 1986;78(suppl):728-735. 15. National Center for Health Statistics. Annual summary of births, marriages, divorces, and deaths: United States, 1993. Monthly vital statistics report; vol 42, no 13. Hyattsville, MD: Public Health Service, 1994. 16. Kelly PW, Petruccelli BP, Stehr-Green P, et al. The susceptibility of young adult Americans to vaccine-preventable infections: a national serosurvey of US Army recruits. JAMA 1991;266:2724-2729. 17. Guess HA, Broughton DD, Melton LJ III, et al. Chickenpox hospitalizations among residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1962 through 1981. Am J Dis Child 1984;138:1055- 1057. 18. Sullivan-Bolyai JZ, Yin EK, Cox P, et al. Impact of chickenpox on households of healthy children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1987;6:33-35. 19. Jackson MA, Burry VF, Olson LC. Complications of varicella requiring hospitalization in previously healthy children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1992;11:441-445. 20. Fleisher G, Henry W, McSorley M, et al. Life-threatening complications of varicella. Am J Dis Child 1981;135:896-899. 21. Edsall G. Specific prophylaxis of tetanus. JAMA 1959;171:417-427. 22. Onorato IM, Wassilak SG, Meade B. Efficacy of whole-cell pertussis vaccine in preschool children in the United States. JAMA 1992;267:2745-2749. 23. Fine PEM, Clarkson JA. Reflections on the efficacy of pertussis vaccines. Rev Infect Dis 1987;9:866-883. 24. Centers for Disease Control. Diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis: recommendations for vaccine use and other preventive measures: recommendations of the Immunization Practices Advisory Committee (ACIP). MMWR 1991;40(RR-10):1-28. 25. Mortimer EA, Jones PK. An evaluation of pertussis vaccine. Rev Infect Dis 1979;1:927-932. 26. Cody CL, Baraff LJ, Cherry JD, et al. Nature and rates of adverse reactions associated with DTP and DT immunizations in infants and children. Pediatrics 1981;68:650-660. 27. Reinstein L. Peripheral neuropathy after multiple tetanus toxoid boosters. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982;63:332-334. 28. Edsall G, Elliot MW, Peebles TG, et al. Excessive use of tetanus toxoid boosters. JAMA 1967;202:111-113. 29. Institute of Medicine. Adverse events associated with childhood vaccines: evidence bearing on causality. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1994. 30. Hinman AR, Koplan JP. Pertussis and pertussis vaccine: reanalysis of benefits, risks, and costs. JAMA 1984;251:3109-3113. 31. Hinman AR, Koplan JP. Pertussis and pertussis vaccine: further analysis of benefits, risks and costs. Dev Biol Stand 1985;61:429-437. 32. Miller DL, Alderslade R, Ross EM. Whooping cough and whooping cough vaccine: the risks and benefits debate. Epidemiol Rev 1982;4:1-24. 33. Institute of Medicine. Adverse effects of pertussis and rubella vaccines. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1991. 34. Stetler HC, Orenstein WA, Bart KJ, et al. History of convulsions and use of pertussis vaccine. J Pediatr 1985;107:175-179. 35. Livengood JR, Mullen JR, White JW, et al. Family history of convulsions and use of pertussis vaccine. J Pediatr 1989;115:527-531. 36. Baraff LJ, Shields WD, Beckwith L, et al. Infants and children with convulsions and hypotonic-hyporesponsive episodes following diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis immunization: follow-up evaluation. Pediatrics 1988;81:789-794. 37. Centers for Disease Control. Adverse events following immunization. MMWR 1985;34:43-47. 38. Miller D, Wadsworth J, Diamond J, et al. Pertussis vaccine and whooping cough as risk factors in acute neurological illness and death in young children. Dev Biol Stand 1985;61:389- 394. 39. Miller D, Madge N, Diamond J, et al. Pertussis immunisation and serious acute neurological illnesses in children. BMJ 1993;307:1171-1176. 40. Institute of Medicine. DPT vaccine and chronic nervous system dysfunction: a new analysis. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1994. 41. Shapiro ED. Pertussis vaccines: seeking a better mousetrap [editorial]. JAMA 1992;267:2788-2790. 42. Morgan CM, Blumberg DA, Cherry JD, et al. Comparison of acellular and whole-cell pertussis-component DTP vaccines: a multicenter double-blind study in 4- to 6-year-old children. Am J Dis Child 1990;144:41-45. 43. Blumberg DA, Mink CM, Cherry JD, et al. Comparison of an acellular pertussis-component diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) vaccine with a whole-cell pertussis-component DTP vaccine in 17- to 24-month-old children, with measurement of 69-kilodalton outer membrane protein antibody. J Pediatr 1990;117:46-51. 44. Blumberg DA, Mink CM, Cherry JK, et al. Comparison of acellular and whole-cell pertussis-component diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccines in infants. J Pediatr 1991;119:194-204. 45. Englund JA, Decker MD, Edwards KM, et al. Acellular and whole-cell pertussis vaccines as booster doses: a multicenter study. Pediatrics 1994;93:37-43. 46. Bernstein HH, Rothstein EP, Pichichero ME, et al. Clinical reactions and immunogenicity of the BIKEN acellular diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine in 4- through 6-year-old US children. Am J Dis Child 1992;146:556-559. 47. Bernstein HH, Rothstein EP, Pennridge Pediatric Association, et al. Comparison of a three-component acellular pertussis vaccine with a whole-cell pertussis vaccine in 15- through 20-month-old infants. Pediatrics 1994;93:656-659. 48. Blennow M, Granstrom M, Jatmaa E, et al. Primary immunization of infants with an acellular pertussis vaccine in a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Pediatrics 1988;82:293- 299. 49. Ad Hoc Group for the Study of Pertussis Vaccines. Placebo-controlled trial of two acellular pertussis vaccines in Sweden_protective efficacy and adverse events. Lancet 1988;1:955-960. 50. Storsaeter J, Hallander H, Farrington CP, et al. Secondary analyses of the efficacy of two acellular pertussis vaccines in a Swedish phase III trial. Vaccine 1990;8:457-461. 51. Blackwelder WC, Storsaeter J, Olin P, et al. Acellular pertussis vaccine: efficacy and evaluation of clinical case definitions. Am J Dis Child 1991;145:1285-1289. 52. Olin P, Storsaeter J. The efficacy of acellular pertussis vaccine[letter]. JAMA 1989;261:560. 53. Aoyama T, Murase Y, Kato M, et al. Efficacy and immunogenicity of acellular pertussis vaccine by manufacturer and patient age. Am J Dis Child 1989;143:655-659. 54. Kato T, Goshima T, Nakajima N, et al. Protection against pertussis by acellular pertussis vaccines (Takeda, Japan): household contact studies in Kawasaki City, Japan. Acta Paediatr Jpn 1989;31:698-701. 55. Mortimer EA, Kimura M, Cherry JD, et al. Protective efficacy of the Takeda acellular pertussis vaccine combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids following household exposure of Japanese children. Am J Dis Child 1990;144:899-904. 55a. Isomura S. Clinical studies on efficacy and safety of an acellular pertussis vaccine in Aichi Prefecture, Japan. Dev Biol Stand 1991;73:37-42. 56. Aoyama T, Iwata T, Iwai H, et al. Efficacy of acellular pertussis vaccine in young infants. J Infect Dis 1993;167:483-486. 57. Kimura M, Kuno-Sakai H, Sato Y, et al. A comparative trial of the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of Takeda acellular pertussis vaccine combined with tetanus and diphtheria toxoids: outcome in 3- to 8-month-old infants, 9- to 23-month-old infants and children, and 24- to 30-month-old children. Am J Dis Child 1991;145:734-741. 58. Centers for Disease Control. Pertussis vaccination: acellular pertussis vaccine for reinforcing and booster use_supplementary ACIP statement. Recommendations of the Immunization Practices Advisory Committee (ACIP). MMWR 1992;41(RR-1):1-10. 59. Centers for Disease Control. Pertussis vaccination: acellular pertussis vaccine for the fourth and fifth doses of the DTP series; update to supplementary ACIP statement. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR 1992;41(RR-15):1-5. 60. Prevots DR, Sutter RW, Strebel PM, et al. Completeness of reporting for paralytic poliomyelitis, United States, 1980 through 1991. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1994;148:479- 485. 61. McBean AM, Thomas MI, Johnson RH, et al. A comparison of the serological responses to oral and injectable trivalent poliovirus vaccine. Rev Infect Dis 1984;6:S552-S555. 62. Centers for Disease Control. Poliomyelitis prevention: enhanced-potency inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine_supplementary statement. MMWR 1987;36:795-798. 63. Institute of Medicine. An evaluation of poliomyelitis vaccine policy options. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1988. 64. Hinman AR, Koplan JP, Orenstein WA, et al. Live or inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine: an analysis of benefits and risks. Am J Public Health 1988;78:291-295. 65. Rantala H, Cherry JD, Shields WD, et al. Epidemiology of Guillain-BarrÇ syndrome in children: relationship of oral polio vaccine administration to occurrence. J Pediatr 1994;124:220-223. 66. Dagan R, Botujansky C, Watemberg N, et al. Safety and immunogenicity in young infants of Haemophilus b-tetanus protein conjugate vaccine, mixed in the same syringe with diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis-enhanced inactivated poliovirus vaccine. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1994;13:356-361. 67. Gold R, Scheifele D, Barreto L, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of Haemophilus influenzae vaccine (tetanus toxoid conjugate) administered concurrently or combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids, pertussis vaccine and inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine to healthy infants at two, four and six months of age. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1994;13:348-355. 68. Centers for Disease Control. Measles prevention. MMWR 1987;36:409-418, 423- 425. 69. Fescharek R, Quast U, Maass G, et al. Measles-mumps vaccination in the FRG: an empirical analysis after 14 years of use. II. Tolerability and analysis of spontaneously reported side effects. Vaccine 1990;8:446-456. 70. Peltola H, Heinonen OP, Valle M, et al. The elimination of indigenous measles, mumps, and rubella from Finland by a 12-year, two-dose vaccination program. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1397-1402. 71. Gindler JS, Atkinson WL, Markowitz LE, et al. Epidemiology of measles in the United States in 1989 and 1990. Pediatr Infect Dis 1992;11:841-846. 72. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Measles_United States, first 26 weeks, 1993. MMWR 1993;42:813-816. 72a. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Measles_United States, 1994. MMWR 1995;44:486-487, 493-494. 73. Markowitz LE, Orenstein WA. Measles vaccine. Pediatr Clin North Am 1990;37:603- 625. 74. Fescharek R, Quast U, Maass G, et al. Measles-mumps vaccination in the FRG: an empirical analysis after 14 years of use. I. Efficacy and analysis of vaccine failures. Vaccine 1990;8:333-336. 75. Orenstein WA, Markowitz LE, Preblud SR, et al. The appropriate age for measles vaccination in the United States. Dev Biol Stand 1986;65:13-21. 76. Lennon JL, Black FL. Maternally-derived measles immunity in sera of vaccine-protected mothers. J Pediatr 1986;108:671-676. 77. Yeager AS, Harvey B, Crosson FJ, et al. Need for measles revaccination in adolescents: correlation with birth date prior to 1972. J Pediatr 1983;102:191-194. 78. Johnson CE, Nalin DR, Chui LW, et al. Measles vaccine immunogenicity in 6- versus 15-month-old infants born to mothers in the measles vaccine era. Pediatrics 1994;93:939-944. 79. Makino S, Sasaki K, Nakayama T, et al. A new combined trivalent live measles (AIK-C strain), mumps (Hoshino strain), and rubella (Takahashi strain) vaccine. Am J Dis Child 1990;144:905-910. 80. Kakakios AM, Burgess MA, Bransby RD, et al. Optimal age for measles and mumps vaccination in Australia. Med J Aust 1990;152:472-474. 81. Robertson CM, Bennett VJ, Jefferson N, et al. Serological evaluation of a measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine. Arch Dis Child 1988;63:612-616. 82. Yuan L. Measles outbreak in 31 schools: risk factors for vaccine failure and evaluation of a selective revaccination strategy. Can Med Assoc J 1994;150:1093-1098. 83. Orenstein WA, Albrecht P, Herrmann KL, et al. The plaque-neutralization test as a measure of prior exposure to measles virus. J Infect Dis 1987;155:146-149. 84. Crawford GE, Gremillion DH. Epidemic measles and rubella in air force recruits: impact of immunization. J Infect Dis 1981;144:403-410. 85. Krugman S, Giles JP, Friedman H, et al. Studies on immunity to measles. J Pediatr 1965;66:471-488. 86. Krugman S. Further-attenuated measles vaccine: characteristics and use. Rev Infect Dis 1983;5:477-481. 87. Mathias RG, Meekison WG, Arcand TA, et al. The role of secondary vaccine failures in measles outbreaks. Am J Public Health 1989;79:475-478. 88. Davis RM, Whitman ED, Orenstein WA, et al. A persistent outbreak of measles despite appropriate prevention and control measures. Am J Epidemiol 1987;126:438-449. 89. Hutchins SS, Markowitz LE, Mead P, et al. A school-based measles outbreak: The effect of a selective revaccination policy and risk factors for vaccine failure. Am J Epidemiol 1990;132:157-168. 90. Nkowane BM, Bart SW, Orenstein WA, et al. Measles outbreak in a vaccinated school population: epidemiology, chains of transmission and the role of vaccine failures. Am J Public Health 1987;77:434-438. 91. Shasby DM, Shope TC, Downs H, et al. Epidemic measles in a highly vaccinated population. N Engl J Med 1977; 296:585-589. 92. Krugman S. Present status of measles and rubella immunization in the United States: a medical progress report. J Pediatr 1977;90:1-12. 93. Markowitz LE, Preblud SR, Fine PEM, Orenstein WA. Duration of live measles vaccine-induced immunity. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1990;9:101-110. 94. Dai B, Chen Z, Lui Q, et al. Duration of immunity following immunization with live measles vaccine: 15 years of observation in Zhejiang province, China. Bull WHO 1991;69:415- 423. 95. Ramsay MEB, Moffatt D, O'Connor M. Measles vaccine: a 27-year follow-up. Epidemiol Infect 1994;409-412. 96. Chen RT, Goldbaum GM, Wassilak SGF, et al. An explosive point-source measles outbreak in a highly vaccinated population. Am J Epidemiol 1989;129:173-182. 97. Edmonson MB, Addiss DG, McPherson JT, et al. Mild measles and secondary vaccine failure during a sustained outbreak in a highly vaccinated population. JAMA 1990;263:2467- 2471. 98. Markowitz LE, Preblud SR, Orenstein WA, et al. Patterns of transmission in measles outbreaks in the United States, 1985-1986. N Engl J Med 1989;320:75-81. 99. Hersh BS, Markowitz LE, Hoffman RE, et al. A measles outbreak at a college with a prematriculation immunization requirement. Am J Public Health 1991;81:360-364. 100. Peltola H, Kayhty H, Virtanen M, et al. Prevention of Haemophilus influenzae type b bacteremic infection with the capsular polysaccharide vaccine. N Engl J Med 1984;310:1561- 1566. 101. Wenger JD, Pierce R, Deaver KA, et al. Efficacy of Haemophilus influenzae type b polysaccharide-diphtheria toxoid conjugate vaccine in US children aged 18-59 months. Lancet 1991;338:395-398. 102. Greenberg DP, Vadheim CM, Bordenave N, et al. Protective efficacy of Haemophilus influenzae type b polysaccharide and conjugate vaccines in children 18 months of age and older. JAMA 1991;265:987-992. 103. Loughlin AM, Marchant CD, Lett S, et al. Efficacy of Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccines in Massachusetts children 18-59 months of age. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1992;11:374- 379. 104. Black SB, Shinefield HR, Fireman B, et al. Efficacy in infancy of oligosaccharide conjugate Haemophilus influenzae type b (HbOC) vaccine in a United States population of 61,080 children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1991;10:97-104. 105. Black SB, Shinefield HR, Lampert D, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of oligosaccharide conjugate Haemophilus influenza type b (HbOC) vaccine in infancy. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1991;10:92-96. 106. Santosham M, Wolff M, Reid R, et al. The efficacy in Navajo infants of a conjugate vaccine consisting of Haemophilus influenzae type b polysaccharide and Neisseria meningitides outer-membrane protein complex. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1767-1772. 107. Vadheim CM, Greenberg DP, Eriksen E, et al. Protection provided by Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccines in Los Angeles County: a case-control study. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1994;13:274-280. 108. Vadheim CM, Greenberg DP, Partridge S, et al. Effectiveness and safety of an Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine (PRP-T) in young infants. Pediatrics 1993;92:272-279. 109. Booy R, Moxon ER, Macfarlane JA, et al. Efficacy of Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine in Oxford region. Lancet 1992;340:847. 110. Fritzell B, Plotkin S. Efficacy and safety of a Haemophilus influenzae type b capsular polysaccharide-tetanus protein conjugate vaccine. J Pediatr 1992;212:355-362. 111. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Food and Drug Administration approval of use of Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine reconstituted with diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine for infants and children. MMWR 1993;42:964-965. 112. Paradiso PR, Hogerman DA, Madore DV, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a combined diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine in young infants. Pediatrics 1993; 827-832. 113. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations for use of Haemophilus influenzae b conjugate vaccines and a combined diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, and Haemophilus influenzae b vaccine. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR 1993;42(RR-13):1-15. 114. Kayhty H, Eskola J, Peltola H, et al. High antibody response to booster doses of either Haemophilus influenzae capsular polysaccharide or conjugate vaccine after primary immunization with conjugate vaccines. J Infect Dis 1992;165(Suppl 1):S165-S166. 115. Decker MD, Edwards KM, Bradley R, et al. Responses of children to booster immunization with their primary conjugate Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine or with polyribosylribitol phosphate conjugated with diphtheria toxoid. J Pediatr 1993;122:410-413. 116. Granoff DM, Holmes SJ, Osterholm MT, et al. Induction of immunologic memory in infants primed with Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccines. J Infect Dis 1993;168:663-671. 117. Black SB, Shinefield HR, and the Kaiser Permanente Pediatric Vaccine Study Group. Immunization with oligosaccharide conjugate Haemophilus influenzae type b (HbOC) vaccine on a large health maintenance organization population: extended follow-up and impact on Haemophilus influenzae disease epidemiology. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1992;11:610-613. 118. Adams WG, Deaver KA, Cochi SL, et al. Decline of childhood Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) disease in the Hib vaccine era. JAMA 1993;269:221-226. 119. Broadhurst LE, Erickson RL, Kelley PW. Decreases in invasive Haemophilus influenzae diseases in US army children, 1984 through 1991. JAMA 1993;269:227-231. 120. Murphy TV, White KE, Pastor P, et al. Declining incidence of Haemophilus influenzae type b disease since introduction of vaccination. JAMA 1993;269:246-248. 121. Vadheim CM, Greenberg DP, Eriksen E, et al. Eradication of Haemophilus influenzae type b disease in southern California. Kaiser-UCLA Vaccine Study Group. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1994;148:51-56. 122. Loughlin AM, Marchant CD, Lett SM. The changing epidemiology of invasive bacterial infections in Massachusetts children, 1984 through 1991. Am J Public Health 1995;85:392- 394. 123. Barbour ML, Mayon-White RT, Coles C, et al. The impact of conjugate vaccine on carriage of Haemophilus influenzae type b. J Infect Dis 1995;171:93-98. 124. Murphy TV, Pastor P, Medley F, et al. Decreased Haemophilus colonization in children vaccinated with Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine. J Pediatr 1993;122:517-523. 125. Greenberg DP, Lieberman JM, Marcy SM, et al. Enhanced antibody responses in infants given different sequences of heterogeneous Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccines. J Pediatr 1995;126:206-211. 126. Daum RS, Milewski WM, Ballanco GA. Interchangeability of H. influenzae type B vaccines for the primary series ("mix and match")_a preliminary analysis [Abstract 976]. Pediatr Res 1993;33:166A. 127. Anderson EL, Decker MD, Englund JA, et al. Interchangeability of conjugated Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccines in infants. JAMA 1995;273:849-853. 128. Decker MD, Edwards KM, Bradley R, et al. Comparative trial in infants of four conjugate Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccines. J Pediatr 1992;120:184-189. 129. Ip HMH, Wong VCW, Lelie PN, et al. Hepatitis B infection in infants after neonatal immunization. Acta Paediatr Jpn 1989;31:654-658. 130. Zhu QR, Duan SC, Xu HF. A six-year survey of immunogenicity and efficacy of hepatitis B vaccine in infants born to HBsAg carriers. Chin Med J 1992;105:194-198. 131. Halliday ML, Kang LY, Rankin JG, et al. An efficacy trial of a mammalian cell-derived recombinant DNA hepatitis B vaccine in infants born to mothers positive for HBsAg, in Shanghai, China. Int J Epidemiol 1992;21:564-573. 132. Theppisai U, Thanuntaseth C, Chiewsilp P, et al. Long-term immunoprophylaxis of hepatitis B surface antigen carrier in infants born to hepatitis B surface antigen positive mothers using plasma derived vaccine. Asia-Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol 1989;15:111-115. 133. Assateerawatt A, Tanphaichitr VS, Suvatte V, et al. Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of low dose recombinant DNA hepatitis B vaccine in normal and high-risk neonates. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 1991;9:89-93. 134. Sehgal A, Gupta I, Sehgal R, et al. Hepatitis B vaccine alone or in combination with anti-HBS immunoglobulin in the perinatal prophylaxis of babies born to HBsAg carrier mothers. Acta Virol 1992;36:359-366. 135. Lo KJ, Tsai YT, Lee SD, et al. Immunoprophylaxis of infection with hepatitis B virus in infants born to hepatitis B surface antigen-positive carrier mothers. J Infect Dis 1985;152:817-822. 135a. Xu ZY, Duan SC, Margolis HS, et al. Long-term efficacy of active postexposure immunization of infants for prevention of hepatitis B virus infection. J Infect Dis 1995;171:54- 60. 136. Hsu HM, Chen DS, Chuang CH, et al. Efficacy of a mass hepatitis B vaccination program in Taiwan. Studies on 3464 infants of hepatitis B surface antigen-carrier mothers. JAMA 1988;260:2231-2235. 137. Assateerawatt A, Tanphaichitr VS, Suvatte V, et al. Immunogenicity and efficacy of a recombinant DNA hepatitis B vaccine, GenHevac B Pasteur in high risk neonates, school children and healthy adults. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 1993;11:85-91. 138. Poovorawan Y, Sanpavat S, Pongpunlert W, et al. Protective efficacy of a recombinant DNA hepatitis B vaccine in neonates of HBe antigen-positive mothers. JAMA 1989;261:3278- 3281. 139. Coursaget P, Yvonnet B, Chotard J, et al. Seven-year study of hepatitis B vaccine efficacy in infants from an endemic area (Senegal). Lancet 1986;1143-1145. 140. Sun ZT, Zhu Y, Stjernsward J, et al. Design and compliance of HBV vaccination trial on newborns to prevent hepatocellular carcinoma and 5-year results of its pilot study. Cancer Detect Prev 1991;15:313-318. 141. Hayashi J, Kashiwagi S, Nomura H, et al. The control of hepatitis B virus infection with vaccine in Japanese nursery schools. Am J Epidemiol 1987;126:474-479. 142. Milne A, Krugman S, Waldon JA, et al. Hepatitis B vaccination in children: five year booster study. NZ Med J 1992;105:336-338. 143. Whittle HC, Maine N, Pilkington J, et al. Long-term efficacy of continuing hepatitis B vaccination in infancy in two Gambian villages. Lancet 1995;345:1089-1092. 144. Fortuin M, Chotard J, Jack AD, et al. Efficacy of hepatitis B vaccine in the Gambian expanded programme on immunisation. Lancet 1993;341:1129-1131. 145. Craxi A, Vinci M, Almasio P, et al. Hepatitis B vaccination of relatives of hepatitis B virus DNA positive carriers: an experience with plasma-derived vaccine. Eur J Epidemiol 1989;5:65-69. 146. Wainwright RB, McMahon BJ, Bulkow LR, et al. Protection provided by hepatitis B vaccine in a Yupik Eskimo population. Arch Intern Med 1991;151:1634-1636. 147. Moulia-Pelat J-P, Spiegel A, Martin PMV, et al. A 5-year immunization field trial against hepatitis B using a Chinese hamster ovary cell recombinant vaccine in French Polynesian newborns: results at 3 years. Vaccine 1994;12:499-503. 148. Tsen YJ, Chang MH, Hsu HY, et al. Seroprevalence of hepatitis B virus infection in children in Taipei, 1989: five years after a mass hepatitis B vaccination program. J Med Virol 1991;34:96-99. 149. Mahoney FJ, Woodruff BA, Erben JJ, et al. Effect of a hepatitis B vaccination program on the prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection. J Infect Dis 1993;167:203-207. 150. McMahon BJ, Rhoades ER, Heyward WL, et al. A comprehensive programme to reduce the incidence of hepatitis B virus infection and its sequelae in Alaskan Natives. Lancet 1989;ii:1134-1136. 151. Pongpipat D, Suvatte V, Assateerawatt A. Efficacy of hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine in long term prevention of HBV infection. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 1988;6:19-22. 152. Lo KJ, Lee SD, Tsai YT, et al. Long-term immunogenicity and efficacy of hepatitis B vaccine in infants born to HBeAg-positive HBsAg-carrier mothers. Hepatology 1988;8:1647- 1650. 153. Hwang L-Y, Lee C-Y, Beasley RP. Five-year follow-up of HBV vaccination with plasma-derived vaccine in neonates: evaluation of immunogenicity and efficacy against perinatal transmission. In: Hollinger FB, Lemon SM, et al, eds. Viral hepatitis and liver disease. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1990:759-761. 154. Lieming D, Mintai Z, Yinfu W, et al. A 9-year follow-up study of the immunogenicity and long-term efficacy of plasma-derived hepatitis B vaccine in high-risk Chinese neonates. Clin Infect Dis 1993;17:475-479. 155. Coursaget P, Leboulleux D, Soumare M, et al. Twelve-year follow-up study of hepatitis B immunization of Senegalese infants. J Hepatol 1994;21:250-254. 156. Whittle HC, Inskip H, Hall AJ, et al. Vaccination against hepatitis B and protection against chronic viral carriage in The Gambia. Lancet 1991;337:747-750. 157. West DJ. Clinical experience with hepatitis B vaccines. Am J Infect Control 1989;17:172-180. 158. Panda SK, Ramesh R, Rao KVS, et al. Comparative evaluation of the immunogenicity of yeast-derived (recombinant) and plasma-derived hepatitis B vaccine in infants. J Med Virol 1991;35:297-302. 159. Hayashi J, Kashiwagi S, Kajiyama W, et al. Comparison of results of recombinant and plasma-derived hepatitis B vaccines in Japanese nursery-school children. J Infect 1988;17:49- 55. 160. Halliday ML, Rankin JG, Bristow NJ, et al. A randomized double-blind clinical trial of a mammalian cell-derived recombinant DNA hepatitis B vaccine compared with a plasma-derived vaccine. Arch Intern Med 1990;150:1195-1200. 161. Gunn TR, Bosley A, Woodfield DG. The safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant hepatitis B vaccine in neonates. NZ Med J 1989;102:1-3. 162. Tan KL, Oon CJ, Goh KT, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of low doses of recombinant yeast-derived hepatitis B vaccine. Acta Paediatr Scand 1990;79:593-598. 163. Goh KT, Tan KL, Kong KH, et al. Comparison of the immune response of four different dosages of a yeast-recombinant hepatitis B vaccine in Singapore children: a four-year follow-up study. Bull WHO 1992;70:233-239. 164. Andre FE. Overview of a 5-year clinical experience with a yeast-derived hepatitis B vaccine. Vaccine 1990;8:S74-S78. 165. Innis BL, Snitbhan R, Hunasol P, et al. Protection against hepatitis A by an inactivated vaccine. JAMA 1994;271:1328-1334. 166. Werzberger A, Mensch B, Kuter B, et al. A controlled trial of a formalin-inactivated hepatitis A vaccine in healthy children. N Engl J Med 1992;327:453-457. 167. Riedemann S, Reinhardt G, Frosner GG, et al. Placebo-controlled efficacy study of hepatitis A vaccine in Valdivia, Chile. Vaccine 1992:10(Suppl 1):S152-S155. 168. Newcomber W, Rivin B, Reid R, et al. Immunogenicity, safety and tolerability of varying doses and regimens of inactivated hepatitis A virus vaccine in Navajo children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1994;13:640-642. 169. Horng Y-C, Chang M-H, Lee C-Y, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of hepatitis A vaccine in healthy children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1993;12:359-362. 170. Van Damme P, Thoelen S, Cramm M, et al. Inactivated hepatitis A vaccine: reactogenicity, immunogenicity and long-term antibody persistence. J Med Virol 1994;44:446- 451. 171. Tilzey AJ, Palmer SJ, Barrow S, et al. Clinical trial with inactivated hepatitis A vaccine and recommendations for its use [published erratum BMJ 1992;304:1352]. BMJ 1992;304:1272-1276. 172. Ellerbeck EF, Lewis JA, Nalin D, et al. Safety profile and immunogenicity of an inactivated vaccine derived from an attenuated strain of hepatitis A. Vaccine 1992;10:668-672. 173. Clemens R, Safary A, Hepburn A, et al. Clinical experience with an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine. J Infect Dis 1995;171(Suppl 1):S44-S49. 174. Briem H, Safary A. Immunogenicity and safety in adults of hepatitis A virus vaccine administered as a single dose with a booster 6 months later. J Med Virol 1994;44:443-445. 175. Van Damme P, Mathei C, Thoelen S, et al. Single dose inactivated hepatitis A vaccine: rationale and clinical assessment of the safety and immunogenicity. J Med Virol 1994;44:435- 441. 176. Jilg W, Bittner R, Bock HL, et al. Vaccination against hepatitis A: comparison of different short-term immunization schedules. Vaccine 1992;10(Suppl 1):S126-S128. 177. Wagner G, Lavanchy D, Darioli R, et al. Simultaneous active and passive immunization against hepatitis A studied in a population of travelers. Vaccine 1993;11:1027- 1032. 178. Shouval D, Ashur Y, Adler R, et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine: effects of single and booster injections, and comparison to administration of immune globulin. J Hepatol 1993;18(Suppl 2):S32-S37. 179. Leentvaar-Kuijpers A, Coutinho RA, Brulein V, et al. Simultaneous passive and active immunization against hepatitis A. Vaccine 1992;10(Suppl 1):S138-S141. 180. Fujiyama S, Odoh K, Kuramoto I, et al. Current seroepidemiological status of hepatitis A with a comparison of antibody titers from infection and vaccination. J Hepatol 1994;21:641- 645. 181. Fujiyama S, Iino S, Odoh K, et al. Time course of hepatitis A virus antibody titer after active and passive immunization. Hepatology 1992;15:983-988. 182. Iino S, Fujiyama S, Horiuchi K, et al. Clinical trial of a lyophilized inactivated hepatitis A candidate vaccine in healthy adult volunteers. Vaccine 1992;10:323-328. 183. Wiedermann G, Ambrosch F, Kollaritsch H, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated hepatitis A candidate vaccine in healthy adult volunteers. Vaccine 1990;8:581-584. 184. Green MS, Cohen D, Lerman Y, et al. Depression of the immune response to an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine administered concomitantly with immune globulin. J Infect Dis 1993;168:740-743. 185. Weibel RE, Neff BJ, Kuter BJ, et al. Live attenuated varicella virus vaccine. Efficacy trial in healthy children. N Engl J Med 1984;310:1409-1415. 186. Kuter BJ, Weibel RE, Guess HA, et al. Oka/Merck varicella vaccine in healthy children: final report of a 2-year efficacy study and 7-year follow-up studies. Vaccine 1991;9:643-647. 187. White CJ, Kuter BJ, Hildebrand CS, et al. Varicella vaccine (VARIVAX) in healthy children and adolescents: results from clinical trials, 1987 to 1989. Pediatrics 1991;87:604- 610. 188. Arbeter AM, Starr SE, Preblud SR, et al. Varicella vaccine trials in healthy children: a summary of comparative and follow-up studies. Am J Dis Child 1984;138:434-438. 189. Johnson CE, Shurin PA, Fattlar D, et al. Live attenuated varicella vaccine in healthy 12- to 24-month-old children. Pediatrics 1988;81:512-518. 190. Arbeter AM, Starr SE, Plotkin SA. Varicella vaccine studies in healthy children and adults. Pediatrics 1986;78(suppl):748-756. 191. Watson BM, Piercy SA, Plotkin SA, et al. Modified chickenpox in children immunized with the Oka/Merck varicella vaccine. Pediatrics 1993;91:17-22. 192. White CJ, Kuter BJ, Ngai A, et al. Modified cases of chickenpox after varicella vaccination: correlation of protection with antibody response. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1992;11:19-23. 193. Asano Y, Nagai T, Miyata T, et al. Long-term protective immunity of recipients of the OKA strain of live varicella vaccine. Pediatrics 1985;75:667-671. 194. Asano Y, Suga S, Yoshikawa T, et al. Experience and reason: twenty-year follow-up of protective immunity of the Oka strain live varicella vaccine. Pediatrics 1994;94:524-526. 195. Nader S, Bergen R, Sharp M, et al. Age-related differences in cell-mediated immunity to varicella-zoster virus among children and adults immunized with live attenuated varicella vaccine. J Infect Dis 1995;171:13-17. 196. Gershon AA, Steinberg SP, LaRussa P, et al. Immunization of healthy adults with live attenuated varicella vaccine. J Infect Dis 1988;158:132-137. 197. Plotkin SA, Starr SE, Connor K, et al. Zoster in normal children after varicella vaccine [letter]. J Infect Dis 1989;159:1000-1001. 198. Brunell PA, Taylor-Wiedeman J, Geiser CF, et al. Risk of herpes zoster in children with leukemia: varicella vaccine compared with history of chickenpox. Pediatrics 1986;77:53- 56. 199. Hardy I, Gershon AA, Steinberg SP, et al. The incidence of zoster after immunization with live attenuated varicella vaccine. N Engl J Med 1991;325:1545-1550. 200. Hammerschlag MR, Gershon AA, Steinberg SP, et al. Herpes zoster in an adult recipient of live attenuated varicella vaccine. J Infect Dis 1989;160:535-537. 201. Halloran ME, Cochi SL, Lieu TA, et al. Theoretical epidemiologic and morbidity effects of routine varicella immunization of preschool children in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 1994;140:81-104. 202. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. General recommendations on immunization: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR 1994;43(RR-1):1-38. 203. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Standards for pediatric immunization practices. Recommended by the National Vaccine Advisory Committee. MMWR 1993;42(RR-5):1- 10. 204. American Academy of Family Physicians. Age charts for periodic health examination. Kansas City, MO: American Academy of Family Physicians, 1994. (Reprint no. 510.) 205. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Family Physicians, and the National Immunization Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommended childhood immunization schedule_United States, January 1995. MMWR 1995;43:959-960. 206. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Update: recommendations to prevent hepatitis B virus transmission_United States. MMWR 1995;44:574-575. 207. American Academy of Pediatrics. Recommendations for the use of live attenuated varicella vaccine. Pediatrics 1995;95:791-796. 207a. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Varicella prevention: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR 1996 (in press). 208. Food and Drug Administration. FDA licenses hepatitis A vaccine. FDA Talk Paper 1995;Feb 22:T95-11. 208a. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Licensure of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine and recomendations for use among international travelers. MMWR 1995;44:559-560. 209. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Certification of poliomyelitis eradication_the Americas, 1994. MMWR 1994;43:720-722. 210. Krahn M, Detsky AS. Should Canada and the United States universally vaccinate infants against hepatitis B? A cost-effectiveness analysis. Med Decis Making 1993;13:4-20. 211. Bloom BS, Hillman AL, Fendrick AM, et al. A reappraisal of hepatitis B virus vaccination strategies using cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med 1993;118:298-306. 211a. Kwan-Gett TS, Whitaker RC, Kemper KJ. A cost-effectiveness analysis of prevaccination testing for hepatitis B in adolescents and preadolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1994;148:915-920. 212. Lieu TA, Cochi SL, Black SB, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a routine varicella vaccination program for US children. JAMA 1994;271:375-381. 213. Brunell PA, Novelli VM, Lipton SV, et al. Combined vaccine against measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella. Pediatrics 1988;81:779-784. 214. Englund JA, Suarez CS, Kelly J, et al. Placebo-controlled trial of varicella vaccine given with or after measles-mumps-rubella vaccine. J Pediatr 1989;114:37-44. 215. Lieu TA, Finkler LJ, Sorel ME, et al. Cost-effectiveness of varicella serotesting versus presumptive vaccination of school-age children and adolescents. Pediatrics 1995;95:632- 638. 216. American Academy of Pediatrics. Recommended ages for administration of currently licensed childhood vaccines-August 1995. AAP News, August 1995.